Auguries

augur:  seer, visionary, a diviner of omens

augury:  sign of the future

inauguration: “The word inauguration stems from the Latin augur, which refers to the rituals of ancient Roman priests seeking to interpret if it was the will of the gods for a public official to be deemed worthy to assume office.” (Websters)

We well know that America wears a thin cloak of Religion often decorated in Red, Blue and White (embroidered with shiny silver stars). And we know American Religion thinks of itself as Christian, perhaps the purest form of Christianity.  Many thinkers, from Frederick Douglass to James Baldwin and more have been our auguries, reading the signs, uncovering that threadbare cloak surrounding the body politic to reveal the naked truth:  American Religion has essentially nothing to do with the life and essential teachings of the socialistic savior and liberal liberator of ancient Palestine.

Like most rational, liberal Americans with an appreciation for our nation’s history, Carol and I were captivated with the Inaugural events yesterday.  Most of the words, music and tradition felt important and meaningful.  We expected the perfunctory hand-on-bible swearing and “so help me God” oath.  We’re not flag-wavers or pledge-sayers, but we have a strong sense of what it means to be an American in a  christianized country that has massive issues to address, not least of which is that christianization.

While we certainly wish President Biden and Vice-President Harris all the best in the hard work ahead of them, work it will take all of us to achieve, it is easy to see a blind spot concerning religiosity in civic matters.  Even in the celebratory spirit of these days (tempered of course by a raging pandemic and raging conspirators against truth), I find myself with a somewhat critical response to the ceremonies this week.

Since Carol and I have worked for many years in the Interfaith world, sensitive to include many voices in public events, we were disappointed to see there were only Christian voices in the main ceremony (even having a rabbi would have been welcomed).  Personally, I found Garth Brooks singing the old, tired Amazing Grace … old, tired and unnecessary.  Do we actually enjoy singing “saved a wretch like me”?

I noticed today’s Interfaith Prayer Service did have more inclusion, with a few odd choices (Hare Krishna representative but no mainline Hindus?).  No Buddhists, no Pagans, no Humanists.  And even the two Navajo tribal leaders offered a prayer “in Jesus’ name”!   Once again, a service to “represent the faiths of the nation” is heavily Christian with lots of “Jesus” every few minutes.

It was a step in the right direction, but there are plenty of models for doing it better, more inclusively and creatively.

Carol and I, as religious leaders, have long experience creating truly welcoming community celebrations.  We made it a point to include secular voices as well.  This can be done, it is done, and it makes a lot of sense to truly represent the spectrum of beliefs across the nation.  We trust the Biden administration will make progress as they listen to a larger chorus of voices.

And, I must say, at least Paula White and Deplorable Don’s whole circle of Pandering Preachers (many of whom predicted their divinely-appointed president would win in a landslide) have scurried back to their golden pulpits! Hallelujah, praise Reason!

2 Thoughts

  1. I wasn’t really pleased with the level of goddiness in the ceremonies either. But I realize it wasn’t aimed at me. It was aimed at the average evangelical Republican voter, who has had four years of being preached to about how Democrats are baby-eating Satanists. Biden not only can give a religion-soaked speech, but unlike Twitler, Biden is honest about it. I would have liked a shout-out to the large non-religious portion of the population, but I don’t need him to do that. We’re going to judge him on his policies and job performance, rather than what he pays lip service to, and I think he knows that.

    And at first I was really peeved about “Amazing Grace” because I hate that song. Until I realized what that was a callback to. Back after the church shooting, at the memorial service, Obama sang that song. I think the inclusion of that song was reminding the black community that once again they have an executive in the White House that is on their side in the fight for equality.

    1. Very good observations, I like the way you state this. The disappointment we feel as secular people in a religion-saturated nation can be channelled into education. I hope a coalition of freethinkers can sit with Joe and Kamala sometime to discuss broader thinking.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s