This idea of “personhood” gets a lot of press.
Some “grant personhood” to masses of cells in women’s bodies, claiming they are protecting, defending, the unseen unborn.
What about what we see, what is already born?
Indigenous tribes have always granted personhood to living things or land in the natural world. The Maori of New Zealand successfully achieved official recognition for them to “grant personhood” to a sacred river.
When I was a chaplain in county jails, I encouraged congregations to “grant personhood” to those judged guilty of crime or sin.
When I was a chaplain on the streets and in shelters among people seeking safe housing, I encouraged the community to “grant personhood” to their poorest and most vulnerable neighbors.
When I was a counselor and chaplain in a residential school, I became an advocate for “granting personhood” to people with mental and physical disabilities.
I wish many politicians and judges would “grant personhood” to migrating refugees, to non-White people, to those who suffer in poverty.
Now, in today’s reflections, I was wondering:
Do people “grant personhood” to Nature, the Cosmos, and call it “God”?
And, for further thought:
Can humans “grant” (give, allow, bestow) such a thing as personhood (whatever that means), to anyone, anything?
Hello Chris. Been a while. I find so much hypocrisy in the pro-life rhetoric and they way the religiousright treat “sinners” and politicians they detest. An unconscious, non-intentional glob of cells now has more rights and protection that many fully formed humans who they do not approve of. The height of the hypocrisy is the failure to support unwed mothers forced to keep their babes in conditions that are deplorable. They say do not kill the life god gave your child but this omnipresent, omniscient and all loving god will not help you with the survival of their life unless you convert as you are a wayward child and must make it on your own. A clump has rights, but a fully formed human+child of billions of cells and consciousness has almost none.
This issue is a political one, not a rational ethical map on how to treat other human beings who are struggling to survive. It has replaced slavery and black civil rights as the new GOP lever to fight back, not show the least bit of compassion.
Amen, brother. Not a lot of compassion, or reason, heard in the blab-o-sphere.