As a teacher concerned with streams of thought, particularly Freethought, I’m continually asking myself who is being left out in the stories we tell, whose voices are not being heard. Though I’m no historian, I’m aware that pulling one thread of the historical narratives is only one thread. To teach history accurately is to teach history honesty.
♦History is like a knot, or better, a twisted thread made of many multi-colored strands
♦People have a reaction when one strand is touched, pulled or emphasized (think: BLM, Women, other sexualities, etc)
(American history is usually taught as one thick white thread or rope. Some get agitated when another color is held up. Btw, this is not simply about race)
♦If we teach healthy skepticism, we will hear from people and voices who are not the “authorities” with their “official reports”
♦History has to be seen through more than a Lens of Power
♦History, like biography, needs to show both the good and the bad of individuals and institutions
♦There is anger and pushback when the White (or male, or Christian) thread is not given the most privileged place in the narrative
♦We are not responsible for what our ancestors did, but we are responsible for telling the whole story truthfully, and for what we do with that now
We either do our best at teaching Whole History (accurate, truthful, balanced) or we end up teaching History with Holes (with important threads missing)
When I teach, I always make it clear I am not a historian; I am choosing to highlight several threads bound together. The twisted cord is long and open for exploration … many strands, many cords!
(further thought for consideration: people, and communities, are woven threads too. Are we hearing, and telling, the whole story?)